Wednesday, May 5, 2010
What I Learned
For my final wall post of the semester, I would like to simply say that I had no idea what to expect from the world of contemporary art. There are just so many different forms I learned that you can really find the art in anything. This is because how you interpret the art is what matters the most. The modern artist knows this and simply does enough to get those juices flowing just to make you think. The rest is up to the audience.
Rock Wall

Posted by Jeff Bruneau
As I browsed through William Powhida’s paintings, I could not believe the incredible amount of detail he puts onto the page. His paintings and drawings are very similar and yet I can’t believe some of his paintings are not drawings because he gets down to the smallest detail. There is just so much going on in every painting. The painting I enjoyed the most was the Rock Wall. I thought it was interesting because it had all the ingredients that one thinks about when they think about the craziness of the music industry and there it was, just slapped onto one frame. It’s funny looking through each picture within the picture and nodding like “yeah, that makes sense.”
Vik Muniz- Diamond Davis

I think Vik Muniz’s ability to use diamonds to shape a portrait is a pretty intriguing concept. My parents were always watching old movies on TV when I was growing so I recognized this one as the star, Bette Davis. It’s interesting because when I find myself looking at it, Muniz does such a fine job that I forget they are diamonds. Even in the hair, where it is not all filled in with diamonds, it still does not strike me as being strange. Although, how he uses the diamonds for the face and for the hair are definitely contrasting techniques. His ability to know where to put the diamonds to give it the correct shading is remarkable.
Visual Art In My Life

This class has really made me think about what kinds of modern art I may have created or come across during the course of my day this past semester. Last week for ROTC we were running around RPI’s campus and I noticed this kind of windmill looking object that was just set in the middle of the academic quad and I definitely thought to myself that it could be considered a work of contemporary art. Then my thoughts shifted to the picture above. This is called a synchronization matrix and its purpose is to detail what every person’s responsibility is during a training event. For example, I find my name in the left most handed column and then trace that row and I know exactly what I need to do at what time. I created this for a weekend training event we had in the middle of April and I color coded it based on the category of one’s responsibility. I think given its purpose and color schemes, I consider it a work of art because a good synch matrix can be the difference between a successful and not so successful training event.
BOB (Bright Orange Ball)

20x200-"Tear the Cover Off Of It"

Mona Lisa Curse Documentary

The Mona Lisa Curse was a documentary by art critic Robert Hughes that discusses the relationship between money and art. I thought it was appropriate timing for when we watched it because there have been different reasons as to why the artists we have taken a look at thus far have gotten into art. I have wanted to know about this because some of these artists that we have looked at make an absurd amount of money. I mean if there are people out there who want to buy and display these works then by all means purchase it but I would just never spend that kind of money on something like that. Like any major industry though, they are looking to make money, like music for example, so I am not that shocked by it.
Tang Museum

Graffiti

Sports Cards Collection

Tang Museum

Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Tang Museum (Skidmore College)

Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
Los Carpinteros
The first thing that I noticed when I walked in was how open the museum was. There was a lot of exhibit space that wasn't used. Looking into one of the rooms before we headed upstairs was a roller coaster looking bed, before we moved on I thought that was going to be the most interesting piece in the place.
As we went upstairs, I couldn't help but feel like we were being watched and followed...and in fact we were, it made us feel really uncomfortable. As we were looking at the artwork, the guy that was working there was standing behind us, it made us feel really rushed and didn't allow for a very good experience. We quickly drifted through the upstairs portion and went back downstairs to get a closer look of the bed, once again a different worker was following us around. We decided to head out as we weren't even enjoying ourselves with these people on our backs the whole time.
While I was at the museum, the roller coaster looking bed was definitely the highlight. The picture above doesn't do it any justice, this thing was huge and looked very contemporary. The whole aspect of this exhibit was that the artist took everyday objects and turned them into fantastical objects.
Overall I would grade my art museum experience a C. Some of the stuff looked interesting, but it was as if we weren't allowed to look at our own pace and it became annoying.

Dave Hickey Podcast
During this podcast Dave Hickey touched on a couple of points that intrigued me. First that some people are getting into the art business for the wrong reasons such as money and secondly that art dealers are creating false values for art. To me if you enter the art world you should be doing it because you love art, the money should just be something that you get should your work be good enough. It is like sports to me, most athletes play sports because it is something that they love to do. The money that professionals get comes along because they happen to be the best in their business, but it is not the reason they start playing sports. The same should be true for artists, be an artist because you love art. The second point about art dealers really bothers me because it does not seem that they care about art what so ever. They are just in the business to get rich and end up driving up the prices of art for their benefit and not because the art is actually worth it. This is wrong and makes it so some people can not afford art that they like and museums, as was described in Mona Lisa's Curse, are unable to purchase art because of the astronomical prices. To me this is completely wrong and seems slimy.
Collections

Tang Museum

Jeff Koons

Earth From Space
20x200

Carsten Holler

This is Carsten Holler's Test Site which was displayed in Tate Modern between October 2006 and April 2007. The work consisted of five slides made of metal and fiberglass. This to me is one of the coolest forms of art I have ever seen because visitors were allowed to slide down the slides. I would never before taking this class have considered something like this art and would have just thought that they were some pretty huge slides. However after taking this class I have broaden my view of what is actually art and this definitely is art and I must say that this is one of the more interesting works I have come across.

9/11 Iwo Jima Relation

Andy Warhol

The Weather Project

Against Interpretation - My Opinion
The Mona Lisa Curse
Monday, May 3, 2010
The Recession that Touched Everything

Custodians of Culture - Schoolyard Art: Playing Fair Without the Referee
20x200

Posted by: Eric Schaible
Art Cars - The Explaination
Jeff Koons - BMW's Next Art Car
Robin Rhode - An Expression of Joy
While the piece may look like it was crafted without any type of guidelines, Mr. Rhode actually began with black finger paint on a piece of paper to illustrate the desired results. From here, he created a storyboard for the drive and gave a driver specific instructions for how to proceed. To actually apply the color, paint nozzles were added within the wheel arches to spray at the artist’s desired time. I think that his project does a great job in showing how art can be linked to many other cultures. By using a brand new car to illustrate his artwork, he has been able to bring the automotive world, where enthusiasts look at a combination of forms and functions, together with a culture based around a vast array of subjects.
Andy Warhol’s 1977 BMW M1 Art Car
With very little background in art, I found Andy Warhol’s work to be quite fascinating because of the canvas that was worked on. Before elaborating on my own thoughts on this piece of art, I would like to give a quick background on the actual car that this work was done on. In 1973, BMW created a division, now known as their M-division, designed specifically for high performance cars. In 1978, they raced their M1, a car originally developed by engineers from Lamborghini, in Formula 1 races, but was required to have a production version of this car available to consumers if they wished to continue racing in the Procar Series. Because of this, 450 M1 cars were produced for their customers with a downgraded 6 cylinder engine that produced significantly less horsepower than their race versions. From the time that this was announced, the M1 was lamented as a collectors’ item.
When asked about his inspiration for the painting, Mr. Warhol said, “I tried to portray speed pictorially. If a car is moving really quickly, all the lines and colors are blurred.” In the video posted above, you can see that the car was painted using paint brushes, as opposed to spray guns which are normally used for production cars, and even his fingers to gain the specific effect that he was looking for. It was also noted that previous artists had used scaled down versions of their cars before actually painting, but Mr. Warhol did not do so. This shows that he was confident in his ability to portray the illusion that he had in his mind directly to the car. While some BMW fanatics do not appreciate the fact that this was done on such a rare car, many might be surprised that this was actually raced competitively in 1979, and won 6th place during the 24-hour Le Mans race. While I also found it disturbing that he would be allowed to do this to a car of its stature, my opinion has been changed because it was actually used as both a marketing piece competitive component to BMW’s racing division.
The weird part about this car is just how it was painted. As stated before, most cars are painted with a spray gun, with brushes being used for small details (such as pin striping). The fact that he went directly at this car with a large paint brush shows the difference between an artist and just a regular body shop worker. I found his attention to detail to be fascinating, with the finger marks throughout the body of the car to show the “speed” aspect of the car. After doing a little more research into this car, I can say that my opinion of Mr. Warhol’s interpretation of this car is a very good representation of what the car was able to do.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Iwo Jima vs. September 11th
Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
Andy Warhol

Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
Now that I have had some time to think about it, and look at the piece again, I have changed my mind. It took me a few times to look at the piece to look back and remember that one of the most basic art projects I have ever done growing up (in middle school) was to recreate a Campbell's soup can with a brush and paint. Whether or not the art teacher had taken this right from Andy Warhol, I don't know but Campbell's soup is something that everybody can relate to. I kind of see where Warhol was going with this piece and I have a new found respect for it.
20x200

Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
The Mona Lisa Curse

Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
Being a business major, the part where paintings were being brought to auction (being bought by the seller at such a low price) and being sold for an incredible amount of money was fascinating. For somebody to take a painting and turn it into such an large profit took more than business knowledge but also a knowledge of society and art. He needed to be ahead of the curve in society to know that those particular paintings were going to catch on the way that they did, and in the end he was rewarded with a hefty payday. Very interesting.
Test Slide 2006

Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
The Weather Project

Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
In doing some research about the exhibit I was surprised to see that over 2 million people went to Tate Modern to see the exhibit, many of them being return customers. It must have been such a surreal feeling to feel like you were in the same room as the sun, being able to look up and see your reflection.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Damien Hirst's Shark

Posted by: Jeff Bruneau
Every time I think about this class, I always happen to reflect upon Damien Hirst's "Shark" that we viewed in class in the beginning of the semester. I do not view it as art at this point because I still can not help but classify things as art in the traditional sense but Hirst definitely provokes the thought great art has been known to do and it has definitely left an impression upon me. The shark, preserved through formaldehyde, is supposed to promote the fear of death, dismemberment, and danger. The shark does not necessarily strike me with a certain degree of fear but it intrigues me so much. I have always been one of those people who finds these great, powerful animals interesting and I was never one to take a pass on an episode from Shark Week; however, I think it really has to do with the improbability that one could be this close to a shark, ready to attack, and still live to tell the tell. The fact that you can even see inside the body without having to worry about getting eaten is pretty incredible. It does not feel right that this fish is out of the water and yet I can not help but stare at the picture and take it all in. The body is preserved so well that its awesome power just speaks for itself. For all the artwork we have seen, this is definitely my favorite one.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
2/16: Stuckism


Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
In class on February 16th one of the concepts that was discussed was "stuckism." I didn't really understand it until I started looking at a bunch of different stuckist paintings. Stuckism was started by Charles Thomson and Billy Childish within the past ten years. Their whole motive was to have an answer to modernism in art. According to the stuckism website, the shark cut in half and put on display would not be considered art. They don't believe that anything dead should be considered art.
After reading a little bit about stuckism I find them to be a strange bunch, almost like a cult or weird political figure in the art world. I will admit that I do not know much about this type of art and would like to learn more but reading between the lines they seem like a very hostile bunch over what type of art is better or worse. With that being said I think that some of their stuff is interesting. I like the picture of the skull that has a caption of "life is great," it gives a lot of meaning to the saying "enjoy life one day at a time."
I would be interested to find more out about this type of art as it is still really confusing to me and their theory's are unorthodox.
2/9 Class: Jeff Koons:

Posted By: Casey LaChapelle
In class on February 9th, we had looked at some of Jeff Koons' work. For the first time I was able to relate to some of the work being showed on the screen. As I have stated previously, my knowledge of art is minimal at best and I can never understand what the artist is portraying.
When we looked at the basketball equilibrium, I was immediately interested in the piece as I saw it as something I would love to have in my office or in a sports bar. Maybe this has to do with my love of sports but when I look at this piece I find that it would be an instant conversation piece, which is the point of art.
Every six months the basketballs go out of equilibrium and have to be reset which gives this piece even more meaning. I feel that everything goes out of balance and needs to be reset in order to gain true success. I would love to see Koons do a series of this work such as a baseball and football equilibrium.
Sue Coe: Artist Activist

Post by: Casey LaChapelle
During class we talked about Sue Coe, and her paintings which focus on animal rights. As I was searching through her pieces, the one titled "modern man followed by ghosts of his meat" really stood out to me. One thing that really intrigued me about Coe's work is the fact that they look very similar to political cartoons, I suppose that is the type of look she is looking for seeing that she is an activist artist.
I am a person who eats meat as a part of every meal and to see the perspective of the artist in this piece actually strikes home to me. Its a really interesting view that she portrays the animals so differently then just livestock raised for eating.
Reaction to "Against Interpretation"
To be completely honest, while I was reading this article I had no idea what to think. I was getting lost in the authors translations of other people, historical time periods, etc. I was beginning to wonder how I was even going to respond to the article, until I read the first paragraph in part five of the article.
"In most modern instances, interpretation amounts to the philistine refusal to leave the work of art alone. Real art has the capacity to make us nervous. By reducing the work of art to its content and then interpreting that, one tames the work of art. Interpretation makes art manageable, comformable. "
After reading this section, it clicked for me, because this is what I do. I am so taken back by art that in order to make sense of it all, I have to put my own meaning into every work that I see. Every single piece of art that is put up in class, whether it is a urinal, a shark split in two, or random canvasses with paint thrown all over them. In my mind I am always trying to to interpret what the artist was thinking.
This article made me realize that there doesn't always need to be a true description on art. Why can't the artist just make something that doesn't need to be thought out and put into a distinct category? Why do I need to make sense of everything all the time? Through reading this article I realized that in order to get the full experience of a piece, just let it come alive and enjoy it for what it is.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Interpretation Reading
This reading was something completely different than most things I've read about that concern art. This is because this reading talked about how we as a society try to over analyze art and interpret its meaning. This reading said how sometimes this is not what we should be doing and in fact some art is meant to just be taken at face value and not looked into and interpreted. Some of the genres of art that get away from interpretation are Abstract painting, pop art and some French poetry. This was incredibly interesting for me to read because I've always heard growing up you have to look at art and try to find its true meaning. Well according to this reading that is not always true. Also this reading talked about movies and how they have not been interpreted yet because of how relatively new cinema is and also how good movies free us from our need to interpret. So overall this reading was a breath of fresh air because it made me feel good about not being able to interpret art because sometimes that is just what the artist wanted.
Sunday, February 28, 2010
The Faces Series - Thomas Mallard

Artwork is not something that comes natural to me. I don’t typically like it, mostly due to the fact that I just don’t understand it. For example, I am using three of Thomas Mallard’s drawings, which combine to make a series called A Year of Faces. Upon first glance of these drawings, it is hard to me to make out anything of significance except that each woman’s face is distorted, with the left side of the drawing being lower than that of the right. There also looks to be the number 2 dividing each side of the face. It is not until I began researching this artwork, then I found out the true meaning of it.
Thomas Mallard is a man who is well versed in the life of art. He has received schooling from UC Berkeley for art but has also done work in dance, sculpture, etchings, and silk-screenings. With much of his life being dealt with computers, he experimented on and off with drawing and designing. One of his biggest influences over time has come from the work of Pablo Picasso. Interestingly enough, after looking at a few of Picasso’s paintings, it seems as if the disfigured face may have actually been copied. Whether or not this is common place in the art world is out of my knowledge, but I did find that to be quite fascinating. Another form of his inspiration comes from a desire to capture the emotions felt by many people, as shown in the faces series.
These drawings are meant to show people as complex, dualistic, and with a wide variety of physical features. This series was drawn in public, where he used people passing by as his subjects. He wanted to be able to show how people acted in their own environments without any type of influence on their behaviors. Actually analyzing these drawings took some explanation from the artist. Each drawing has more shading on the left side, which makes the viewer realize that there are actually two subjects. The reason for the two mixed into one actual face is to highlight the fact that there are many opposites about people. Such ideas of male vs. female and black vs. white are all supposed to observations by the viewer. By drawing these in public, he is able to draw one subject head on, while the profile of another person is used.
As a casual observer of these pieces, it is hard to formulate an opinion as to whether I think that they should be considered special or not. The faces, at first glance, merely look to be split in the middle with a disfigured emotion. However, after taking note from what the author wanted people to observe, I can realize that there are subtle pieces that cannot be seen unless there is time taken to understand the piece.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
John Pedlow's Essay

The contemporary artwork that I choose to look at was Alexander Calder’s sculpture Flamingo. I find that metal sculptures are one form of art that I truly do not understand what so ever. I guess you could say that this has something to do with my extremely limited knowledge of art as a whole. Also though growing up I when the word art was mentioned I thought of painting and most likely Picasso or Van Gogh just because they are two of the most commonly known painters. That said though Flamingo is not your average metal sculpture, there is just something about it that catches your eye right off the bat. This very well could be the bright red color that is not typical of metal sculptures or its extreme size in the middle of Chicago, but there is definitely something that catches your eye about this sculpture.
This sculpture is the only sculpture that I can remember (and I haven’t seen that many) that was aesthetically interesting to me. To me the color of the sculpture is what initially catches my eye because it is not the color you expect to see when you think of metal sculptures. After that the actual shape of the sculpture is interesting to me, I do not quite understand why the shape catches my eye as much as it does but there is something about it that intrigues me. That is one of the reasons I took this class however, because I want to develop more of an understanding of art so that I can appreciate it later in life.
Alexander Calder was the artist who sculpted Flamingo and he was born in 1898 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and lived until 1976. He was a third generation sculptor and his grandfather was the man who sculpted the figure of William Penn that sits atop the dome of city hall in Philadelphia. However Calder was more mechanical driven at an early age and studied mechanical engineering at the Stevens Institute of Technology in New Jersey. After receiving his degree in 1919, Calder held a number of jobs until he tried his hand at art. He gained fame for his sculptures and mobiles over time and his fame peaked in the 1970’s, which happens to be the era that Flamingo was created in. Flamingo was created unveiled in 1974 in Chicago. This sculpture is a massive 50 ton work of art and is made up of steel and is located in Chicago’s Federal Plaza. I hope to at one point after taking this class to be able to look at a work of art like this and at least try and be able to understand it.
Monday, February 15, 2010

Taking Issue with a Contemporary Art Piece
Posted by: Casey LaChapelle
In doing some research on the Internet to find the perfect painting or sculpture that I didn't understand, it dawned on me that as long as I can remember, I turned my nose up to modern/contemporary paintings. I have downright found them unappealing. Growing up, my great grandfather was a painter, he did this for a living and I, still to this day love his work never understood why people would look at a piece of contemporary artwork and believe that it was good.
The given reason above is the main premise on why I decided to take this class, as I would like to me more educated about art as a whole and not sound or think so naive when it comes to good art. I finally came up with a painting that I look at and say to myself, "I just don't understand what is going on here". It is titled "Blue Vase" painted by José Manuel Merello. Merello is a Spanish born artist who states that his work has some Picasso in it, but likes to add that this is mainly his own style. He is also a self-taught artist who has paintings shown throughout the world.
In looking at this picture (appendix A) at first glance all I see are a bunch of heavy strokes on a canvas that a typical elementary student could do. Although I don't find this art beautiful or interesting, after looking at the piece for a period of time it began to dawn on me that art is truly in the eye of the beholder. No one person will look at art in the same exact way.
This type of painting is Merello's style. In looking at his other works, you can see a distinct pattern in the way he creates his paintings. They all have a distinct look about them. The painting that I chose, "Blue Vase", is very distinct because although there is so much going on around the featured blue vase in the painting, one thing sticks out and that is the blue vase in general.
It took me some time to realize Merello's style, but when I did it began to make sense to me. All of his paintings have one thing that is in the center, the focal point that the viewer automatically sees, at which point all of the other strokes and things in the painting mold together to form sort of a natural boarder around that one point.
I hope that in taking this class I will be able to distinguish between different artists and not have such a closed mind when it comes to different types of art that I may not be accustomed to.